Cesetonline

Abstract

In the initial phase of work is in hand to examine and develop an operating system is Linux, a city renowned for Windows starts returning to the legend began to examine the uninstall. Windows and Linux installations first to review reputation began looking at the difference. Step in this direction will install the windows under the 3 title will be known to analyze the bala noticed. I setup from scratch, restore, and recovery are classified as know. Linux is an operating system directly on any established as zero or as known as an operating system installed to my knowledge been released. Although complex and difficult  installed ie Windows or Linux is so simple and easy setup salience. 
Another issue was the file system differences. In this regard, it has hit my eye a lot different. These are still used in Windows uses the FAT12, FAT16, FAT32 and / or NTFS file systems. The Linux ext2, ext3, ext4 XFS, JFS, JFFS and uses the file system and Linux Reiser3 like in these days is developing Reiser4. This difference in the Linux reputation that started the legend of the city “Linux is not infected” concept launched. Simple as this matter is complicated in fact. Windows user account establishes joint and this will take account of the work of any file download from the internet all that is in the middle of the operating system Linux, but situation is also different sizes. Linux installation under a user opens the Root and the root allows the process to continue. This user knows the root, but the virus does not know the manufacturer of the operating system with a password of all the arms are kept separate from the one that developed because of Linux against a virus is downloaded, can not get out of position hedge against virus attacks Linux Windosdan is over. In this stage, we examine the security is a more durable against the expansions Linux Windows.In this context, the differences between Linux and Windows unfurl in a clear manner in the case.

Introduction

Differences between Windows and Linux, the first review of these two operating systems installed on the computer and continue to be looking at the differences in file systems, security and should be reviewed for errors of attitude. In this article I tried to transfer them to you as best I can.

Installing the Operating System

There are three ways to install Windows XP: a clean install, an upgrade install and a repair install. Then, there is a “recovery” install, which is not an install in the true sense of the word but rather the restoration of a disk image backup.

• A clean install refers to starting with nothing (either an entirely empty hard disk or just an empty partition or just unallocated space on the hard disk) and ending up with just Windows.
• An upgrade install refers to starting with an older version of Windows and ending up with a newer version. Existing data files and applications should not be affected by the upgrade to the newer edition of Windows.
• A repair install refers to installing the same version of Windows on top of itself. This is used to fix a broken copy of Windows and existing data files and applications are not affected.
• A “recovery” is typically used to restore a computer to its factory fresh state. All data files are wiped out. All applications installed since the computer was new, are wiped out. All upgrades to Windows itself (patches, service packs) are lost. Applications pre-installed by the computer manufacturer are restored. Originally this was done from CDs, then DVDs. Now it is normally done from a hidden area of the hard disk.

That is difficult and complicated installation of Windows.

There is a huge variation in the Linux installation procedure. Different distributions of Linux have their own installation programs (which may even change with different versions of the same distribution). Installing Linux on a computer without an existing operating system is much easier than installing it on a machine with an existing OS that you want to preserve.

I’m sure that installing Linux is getting easier all the time. While I haven’t done it all that often, I have seen it become easier over time. Is it easy enough for you?

When installing Linux on a machine where you don’t need to preserve the existing operating system, there is likely to be an option to clobber the existing OS as part of the Linux installation procedure. Or, you can use a program to totally wipe everything off the hard disk before installing Linux. The free Darik’s Boot and Nuke is fairly famous for this. Better yet, the hard disk vendor should have a free utility that not only wipes the hard disk but also can run diagnostics on the disk.

File Systems

Windows uses FAT12, FAT16, FAT32 and/or NTFS with NTFS almost always being the best choice. The FATx file systems are older and have assorted limitations on file and partition size that make them problematical in the current environment. Linux also has a number of its own native file systems. The default file system for Linux used to be ext2, now it is typically ext3. Other supported file systems includes XFS, JFS, JFFS and Reiser3. Reiser4 is in development.
The ext3 file system is being replaced by ext4. Among the improvements in ext4 is an increase in the maximum file system size from 16 terabytes in ext3 to one exabyte. The largest file in ext3 is 2 terabytes, in ext4 it is 16 terabytes. Open Solaris includes ZFS which seems like a drastic change in file system design.

File systems can be either journaled or not. Non-journaled systems are subject to problems when stopped abruptly. All the FAT variants and ext2 are non-journaled. After a crash, they should be examined by their respective health check utilities (Scan Disk or Check Disk or fsck). In contrast, when a journaled file system is stopped abruptly, recovery is automatic at the next reboot. NTFS is journaled. Linux supports several journaled file systems: ext3, ext4, reiserfs and jfs.

All the file systems use directories and subdirectories. Windows separates directories with a back slash, Linux uses a normal forward slash. Windows file names are not case sensitive. Linux file names are. For example “abc” and “ aBC” are different files in Linux, whereas in Windows it would refer to the same file. Case sensitivity has been a problem for this very web page, the name of which is “ Linux.vs.Windows.html”. At times, people have tried to get to this page using “ linux.vs.windows.html” (all lower case) which resulted in a Page Not Found error. Eventually, I created a new web page with the name in all lower case and this new page simply re-directs you to the real page, the one you are reading now (with a capital L and W).

Security

The vast majority of malicious software (of all types) runs on Windows. I don’t know the actual percentages, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it was 98% or so. Windows users are burdened with the need for anti-virus and anti-spyware software. Linux users are not. Why is this?

Linux operating system is installed, a user opens an account and creates the user home directory. We can liken this to my home directory windowstaki documents. all system files in Linux, the home directory on the root directory. in the root directory of the user to do even the smallest action that file to run this operation, copy, move or delete files can be root by using the step-by-step şifresiini must perform. that all system files, the virus preparation did not know that the programmers behind a password known only to the user. There are many more factors besides linux makes u strong. very large proportion of executable files, for example azlığıda provides advantages. desktop operating system in our windows misalen and snap open a file can only home in our index linuxte to affect only the home directory to open. If you want to affect the system, the obstacle here, then again with authority karşılacaktır virus.

Bugs

All software has and will have bugs (programming mistakes). Linux has a reputation for fewer bugs than Windows, but it certainly has its fair share. This is a difficult thing to judge and finding an impartial source on this subject is also difficult. Fred Langa wrote an interesting article on whether Linux or Windows has fewer bugs in Information Week magazine January 27, 2003. The article also addressed whether known bugs are fixed faster with Linux or Windows. In brief, he felt that bugs used to be fixed faster in Linux, but that things have slowed down. See this article too Security research suggests Linux has fewer flaws December 13, 2004 from CNET News.com.

In March 28, 2003, Microsoft decreed that it will not issue a Windows NT4 bug fix for a security problem that effects Windows 2000, XP and NT4. They would prefer customers to move off of NT4, thus making Microsoft more money. It is their ball, their bat and their field. This is not true with an open source operating system such as Linux. No one can decree that a bug will not be fixed in a specific version of Linux.

The difference in OS development methodologies may explain why Linux is considered more stable. Windows is developed by faceless programmers whose mistakes are hidden from the outside world because Microsoft does not publish the underlying code for Windows. They consider it a trade secret. In contrast, Linux is developed by hundreds of programmers all over the world. They publish the source code for the operating system and any interested programmer, anywhere in the world can review it. Besides the wide audience for peer review, there is likely to be pride of ownership on the part of the developers of Linux that can not exist with Windows. The official term is “egoboo” which refers to the rush a programmer gets from public recognition, especially for something done for free. Bruce Perens (Business Week magazine, March 3, 2003 issue) commented on why open source software works well:

…it taps into the true motivation of programmers in a way that corporations often don’t. Programmers are like artists … They like to showcase their best stuff for their peers. In open source, they can. But at most corporations, their best work is hidden behind locked and guarded doors.

As to Microsoft’s OS development methodology, Michael Miller of PC Magazine reported that Chris Jones, Vice President of the Windows Client team, “stressed” that Microsoft’s priority when developing Vista “was to change the process of developing Windows to ensure that the underlying code was tighter and more secure.

Conclusion

As a result from this study will point out, easier and more reliable than Linux to Windows is an operating system. Have given in this regard in the light of the information in terms of popular culture, just a lot of Windows software and hardware manufacturers to Linux is used a little more emphasis than in the case of multi-use Windows to Linux is a reality. If these developments in a day if over dominance of Windows to infinity, the Windows operating system, exact a high toll on the cheap will have to go and various operating systems in the world with a computer in our lives we will be continuing.

Referances

1. http://www.uludagsozluk.com/k/linux-a-virus-bulasmaz/
2. http://www.michaelhorowitz.com/Linux.vs.Windows.html
3. http://www.koodla.com/2008/03/27/linux-windows-karsilastirmasi/
4. http://www.webhatti.com/isletim-sistemleri/84666-linux-ile-windows-un-farklari.html
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Windows_and_Linux
6. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/default.mspx
7. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/22/security_report_windows_vs_linux/